Behavioral Analytics for Store Operations

Behavioral Analytics for Store Operations

Behavioral Analytics for Store Operations

Driving $400K in Strategic Decisions with Behavioral Analytics in Store Operations

Cost Savings

$97,280

Annually

Compliance Gaps

3 key insights

For task completion uncovered

Strategic Adjustments

2 features

Previously considered key

    Key Takeaways

    • Operational Scale: 4.2 million pallets verified in the first two periods.

    • Loss Prevention: Forecasted $8.4 million in shrink reduction.

    • Adoption: 98% storewide adoption of pallet scanning functionality.

    Implemented a real-time scanning solution that improved pallet verification accuracy, reduced shrink, and increased operational efficiency across enterprise stores.

  • The UX Problem

    Store associates lacked a real-time verification method, leading to errors and inefficiencies.

    The lack of tracking visibility disrupted supply chain operations.

    The Business Impact

    Overstocking of incorrect inventory, increasing shrink risk.

    Workarounds where store leaders sold misplaced inventory, causing financial losses.

    Store associates previously relied on paper load sheets to verify pallet deliveries, leading to a manual and error-prone process that caused:

    Problem Framing (Empathize & Define)

  • Early Explorations & Trade-offs

    Manual Scanning for pallets with missing barcode label → Simple but still required associate effort.

    Unload and stage time estimates to help associates better assess their productivity.


    Storage ID for better accountability of cold chain pallets

    Design & Execution (Prototype & Decision-Making)

  • Challenge Overcome: Driving Adoption

    Initial Barrier: Store associates were hesitant to change workflows, citing time constraints and unfamiliarity.

    Solution: working with SMEs and store leaders to conduct in-store pilots, refining user training materials and the UX to reduce scanning friction and adding audio cues for real-time correction without slowing down work.

    Outcome: The adjustments led to 98% adoption, surpassing expectations.

    Design & Execution (Prototype & Decision-Making)

  • Final UX/UI Screens & Walkthrough

    Design & Execution (Prototype & Decision-Making)

  • User Feedback & Testing Rounds

    3 rounds of usability testing revealed the need to track and quantify missing pallets.

    Post launch user feedback surfaced the need to use pallet data to inform nightly stocking strategies.

    Behavioral analytics insights identified gaps in scanning compliance.

    Iterative Loop - Unmet Needs (Iteration & Impact)

    Key Learnings & Strategic Influence

    Leadership in Change Management:
    Drove alignment between design, operations, and supply chain teams to ensure adoption.

    Scaling & Future Considerations from User Research: Explore ways to dynamically update BOH using verified delivery data and automate claims.

Leadership

Wrote business case for Behavioral Analytics: Made the case for why behavioral data was critical to improving associate tools and optimizing operating expenses

Strategic Alignment: Worked across Product, Engineering, and Operations to ensure implementation supported business goals like reducing shrink and increasing revenue

Empowered Designers & Teams: Ensured designers could access behavioral data for their own decision-making and optimizations.

Hands-On

Implementation Roadmap: Led workshops with engineers to ensure non-intrusive data capture that aligned with privacy and compliance guidelines.

Prototyped Dashboards & Reporting Insights: Iterated on segmentation views to analyze data by division, role, and department.

How we got there: Design Strategy

Implemented Auto-Capture Behavioral Analytics:

  • Provided real-time insights into how associates interact with both apps.

  • Reduced need for manual feedback collection, fast-tracking the discovery phase.

Enhanced Process Optimization & Task Completion Tracking:

  • Monitored bottlenecks in stocking, replenishment, and verification workflows.

  • Identified gaps in policy compliance and opportunities for task automation.

Results & Impact

Low Feature Utilization:

  • Identified a feature used by only a small group of stores, prompting a reassessment of its value.

  • One of the applications is only used by 1/3 of stores, questioning its necessity in the overall ecosystem.

Efficiency Gaps in Task Execution:

  • Store Walks are completed at an abnormally rapid pace, raising concerns about whether they are being rushed or bypassed.

  • Sanitation tasks were logged at an average of six per day, with each entry taking just eight seconds, suggesting potential compliance gaps.

Cost Savings & Strategic Adjustments:

  • Leadership initially planned to maintain three key features within the Store Walks app, assuming they were critical. However, analysis proved that two of those features did not justify the cloud and maintenance costs, leading to a shift in strategy.

  • Proved that at least one feature should not be upgraded immediately due to a dependency on an API upgrade.

Influencing Leadership Decisions on Third-Party Adoption:

  • Leadership sought to transition capabilities to a third-party vendor despite lacking strong data to justify the move.

  • Behavioral analytics provided concrete evidence on feature usage and inefficiencies, helping to counter poor decision-making based on assumptions.

Resource Optimization & Cost Savings:

  • More accurate tracking led to optimized training investments and higher ROI on tool enhancements.

  • Provided leadership with better visibility, reducing unnecessary feature development efforts.

Iterative Loop - Unmet Needs

Further Correlation Analysis:

  • In Phase 1, behavioral analytics provided insights into feature adoption and efficiency gaps, but did not correlate behavior with financial metrics at the store level.

  • Moving forward, we need to refine and enhance the definition of behavioral cohorts to better connect specific behaviors with financial outcomes.

  • This will ensure that strategic decisions regarding feature investment, training, and process automation are directly tied to measurable business impact.

Impact Highlights

Operational Scale

4.2 million

4.2 million

4.2 million

pallets

pallets

pallets

User verified in first 2 months

Loss Prevention

$4 million

$4 million

$4 million

loss prevented

loss prevented

loss prevented

Across 8,000 mis-delivered pallets

Adoption

98% of stores

98% of stores

98% of stores

using the Night Crew tool

using the Night Crew tool

using the Night Crew tool

Adopted Pallet Scanning feature

My Role & Contribution

Leadership

Hands-On

Problem Statement & Business Context
Solutions
How we got there: Design Strategy
Results & Impact
Iterative Loop - Unmet Needs